🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," said the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this international debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.